If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I personally think the money went to the right people, and i dont necessarily mean the best team.
Before the match, day before i think?, they interviewed a guy from the Standford team, i forgot his name, but he was a bout 22/23, they asked him what he would do with the money if he won.....straight away he said he would finish building his mums house........ and after that he would build himself a house as well.
I thought it was great. I loved it for the first two overs, started getting exasperated as key wickets fell, then thought how funny/farcial it was becoming by the time about 5 were out, enjoyed the near last wicket stand by England and then willed on the big hits by the Windies. Its a great format of an inherently boring game. I still like tests but this is great for entertainment over and done in 3 hours or so.
The pressure of the money clearly got to the team but then again the Windies just kept it simple. Straight balls everytime to catch out any wayward batting. Its a shame the chap dropped the catch near the end otherwise it would have been as flawless as you could hope for. I agree the money went to the right people and the "down to earth with a bump" for the England team is no bad thing.
The part I don't get is why don't they agree to split the money $750k to every member of the team (playing or not). Thats a much better team principle rather than the haves and have nots...?!
Comment