gnmmmm hnmmmm bhhhhhh guuuunnmmmmm....
(That's the sound of me biting my tongue )
Nope, it's no good....
In my opinion, not taking the decision is purely for the benefit of the human conscience.
The rabbit won't suffer, it won't know anything about it, and it's not likely to come back and haunt anybody.
It can't be 'set free', because it would suffer, and so would any other creature it came across.
It can't be re-homed because it's evil.
It would be unfair to expect an animal charity to waste good money, which they don't have enough of, to keep it alive and keep being savaged just for the sake of it...
To me. that only leaves one option.
I have had to make that decision myself, on a couple of occasions. And no, it's not to be taken lightly, but it shouldn't be shied away from because of sentimentality, just to end up putting the decision onto someone else.
(That's the sound of me biting my tongue )
Nope, it's no good....
In my opinion, not taking the decision is purely for the benefit of the human conscience.
The rabbit won't suffer, it won't know anything about it, and it's not likely to come back and haunt anybody.
It can't be 'set free', because it would suffer, and so would any other creature it came across.
It can't be re-homed because it's evil.
It would be unfair to expect an animal charity to waste good money, which they don't have enough of, to keep it alive and keep being savaged just for the sake of it...
To me. that only leaves one option.
I have had to make that decision myself, on a couple of occasions. And no, it's not to be taken lightly, but it shouldn't be shied away from because of sentimentality, just to end up putting the decision onto someone else.
Comment