Originally posted by Jungle Jane
View Post
Allow me to revise my statement: Humans are designed to be able to catch, and process animal proteins. No, we don't see gorillas eating pigs and cows, obviously--because those organisms don't exist in their natural habitat and they didn't evolve alongside one another. Moreover Gorillas are omnivorous (they eat a range of insects, mostly termites). Yes, I have seen Gorilla canines. They are enormous, long and sharp, to wit:
This is not indicative of a predatory diet however. The presence of those teeth no doubt serve some other function because Gorillas are predominantly herbivorous, but not exclusively.
I'm not going to validate the question of Gorillas having barbecues with a response.
Secondly, it's patently obvious that you deliberately cited Gorillas (which are one of closest relatives) as a means of excusing yourself from an explanation in regards to the evidence I cited re chimps, which are our closest relatives, which we know to be predatory, because you are unable to resolve this phenomenon within the parameters of the ism to which you subscribe. Nothing so see here--look over there!
I'm sorry, but this is an incredibly annoying thing to do and is an inversion of object reasoning.
Lastly, we have short digestive tracts comparably to that of true herbivores which are longer than those of true carnivores, which enables us to process both meat and vegetation. Our stomachs have hydrochloric acid in them for digesting meat. Organisms which are predatory invariably spike for higher intelligence, and we are the most intelligent of organisms. Early humans and pre-humans are both known to have consumed animal protein. Traditional lifestyle (Indigenous) populations acquired most of their energy from meat. And so forth.
Look, I'm happy that you don't support factory farming and every person who goes vegetarian/vegan is one less person buying into that cycle of cruelty, and is reducing suffering. But please be realistic--and keep philosophy out of science.
s
Comment