This one will cause arguments, insults and possibly even blood to run but I'm going to (deliberately) put the proverbial cat amongst the proverbial pigeons. If I should get expelled from GYO's site...well it should be fun.
Will some organic gardener please explain why chemicals delivered by a so called organic process should make vegetables taste better, or be better for you, than chemicals delivered by a manufacturing process? Loads of tests have shown that if you feed people a plate of organic potatoes and a plate of potatoes grown using commercial fertilisers, nobody can tell the difference. And analysis shows that there is no difference in nutritional value.
If I deliver a milligram of, say, potassium to a plant using, again say, comfrey, why should that milligram of potassium be any better than a milligram delivered by sulphate of potash? Chemically it is the same. The plant can't tell the difference between the two. But we are obliged to pay a lot more for supermarket 'organically grown' or work a lot harder for home 'organically grown' vegetables.
Now before you come round here and plant a bomb under our bed let me say that I can argue the organic case as well. But I think on a proper gardening forum that the members, both organic, and I hope that there are enough people who just think it is a load of twaddle, and inorganic can have a serious debate on this. (Preferably without killing anybody - like me).
By the way. I once got half the members on a forum to not talk to me for trying to get them to discuss who was the best TV gardener. Anybody got a LARGEwooden spoon?
P.S. Keep your attacks scientific, not emotional.
Will some organic gardener please explain why chemicals delivered by a so called organic process should make vegetables taste better, or be better for you, than chemicals delivered by a manufacturing process? Loads of tests have shown that if you feed people a plate of organic potatoes and a plate of potatoes grown using commercial fertilisers, nobody can tell the difference. And analysis shows that there is no difference in nutritional value.
If I deliver a milligram of, say, potassium to a plant using, again say, comfrey, why should that milligram of potassium be any better than a milligram delivered by sulphate of potash? Chemically it is the same. The plant can't tell the difference between the two. But we are obliged to pay a lot more for supermarket 'organically grown' or work a lot harder for home 'organically grown' vegetables.
Now before you come round here and plant a bomb under our bed let me say that I can argue the organic case as well. But I think on a proper gardening forum that the members, both organic, and I hope that there are enough people who just think it is a load of twaddle, and inorganic can have a serious debate on this. (Preferably without killing anybody - like me).
By the way. I once got half the members on a forum to not talk to me for trying to get them to discuss who was the best TV gardener. Anybody got a LARGEwooden spoon?
P.S. Keep your attacks scientific, not emotional.
Comment